Analysis Method & Score Calculation
This page describes how scores are calculated, which thresholds we use, and how the report pipeline works. This tool is educational and not diagnostic.
FREE: the first 5 domains. PREMIUM: all 8 domains.
| Domain | Tier | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Focus & Concentration | FREE | Attention and sustained concentration. |
| Planning | FREE | Setting goals and planning steps. |
| Organisation | FREE | Ordering materials and time. |
| Impulse Control | FREE | Managing impulses and thinking before acting. |
| Flexibility | FREE | Switching and adapting to change. |
| Working Memory | PREMIUM | Holding information during tasks. |
| Emotion Regulation | PREMIUM | Recognising and regulating emotions. |
| Task Initiation | PREMIUM | Starting tasks on time. |
5-point Likert Scale
Answers are averaged per domain. The displayed scores are domain averages on a 1 to 5 scale.
Display Thresholds (report categorisation)
For categorisation in the report to parents, the following thresholds are used:
| Category | Threshold |
|---|---|
| Natural Strength | ≥ 3.6 |
| In Balance | 2.6 – 3.5 |
| Takes Energy | < 2.6 |
In addition, there are separate thresholds for the EF profile (School-Type Compass) and the adaptive quiz system (deepening questions). See the sections below.
Question Levels
- Screening — broad indication (always shown)
- Deepening — deepening when screening score < 2.5
- Strength — identifying strengths (always shown)
Trigger Logic
Deepening questions are triggered when the score on a domain falls below the threshold (e.g., 2.5).
Respondent Types and Age Groups
Respondent: parent (about child), child (about themselves), self (adult).
Age groups: 8–11, 12–14, 15–18 (language and framing are adjusted accordingly).
Steps 1–3: purely algorithmic, no AI. Steps 4–5: AI generation and quality control, including a forbidden-words check (90+ Dutch words, 8 categories).
Formula: 40% EF fit (cosine similarity with school-type weights) + 60% learning preference.
EF mismatch penalty: corrects when the child has low scores (< 3.0) on domains that weigh heavily for a school type, so no unrealistic "strong" matches arise.
Match Classification: strong ≥ 75, potential ≥ 50, less_fitting < 50.
Analyses the difference between parent and child scores (perception gap). Both perspectives are presented as valid; the report is informative, not alarming.
- Educational tool, not diagnostic or clinical
- Based on self-report or parent report
- Results are a snapshot and may vary over time
- Not validated as a replacement for clinical assessment
Partnership or B2B?
Visit our page for professionals for partnership, whitelabel and question-bank quality information.
To For Professionals